The dark side of intangibles? Organizational capital and corporate investment efficiency
May 01, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JAL-06-2024-0120
Published in: Journal of Accounting Literature
Purpose Organizational capital (OK) represents an important intangible productive firm asset, yet one subject to agency problems. This paper provides a first examination of how OK impacts corporate investment inefficiency using an unbalanced panel of listed US companies from 2009 to 2020. Design/methodology/approach We utilize fixed-effect regressions to explore the relationship between OK and investment efficiency. Additionally, we implement a battery of robustness tests of the main study findings based on a variety of panel data techniques, including firm fixed effects, alternative measures of investment efficiency, estimators, including Newey–West as well as additional steps to address endogeneity concerns using system-GMM, two-stage least-squares and entropy balancing analyses. Findings OK is associated with reduced investment efficiency (underinvestment and overinvestment). A one-standard deviation increase in OK to total assets is associated with a 4.42% decrease in investment efficiency. Based on average firm investment, this represents a $390.88 million decrease in investment. CEO gender and career concerns as well as R&D intensity, positively moderate this relationship, while CEOs’ age, power, tenure and connections as well as corporate governance and disclosure quality, negatively moderate it. The findings can be understood from the perspective of agency theory, whereby informational asymmetries surrounding OK make it challenging for firm outsiders to monitor and evaluate managerial investment choices. Originality/value We lack understanding as to how it impacts the efficiency of corporate investment. We contribute the first evidence in this regard by demonstrating that OK is associated with lower investment efficiency.
Other Researches
High-profile leadership: celebrity CEOs and corporate cash reserves
Purpose Using a hand-collected dataset, this research contributes to the literature on how CEO personal qualities influence company choices and decision-making. To accomplish this, it investigates the relationship between the CEO’s personal celebri...
Right-to-Work Laws and Firm Productivity in U.S. Firms
We investigate the impact of Right-to-Work (RTW) laws on firm-level total factor productivity (TFP) in U.S. firms. We find that RTW laws, which reduce union bargaining power, are associated with a decrease in firm-level TFP, particularly for firms a...
Being famous matters: Evidence from cash flow volatility
Corporate reputation is a paramount driver of value creation and competitive advantage in the 21st century. Motivated by the importance of cash flows and the under-researched nature of their volatility in the corporate finance literature, we investi...
Are MBA CEOs really more risk-averse?
This paper extends the literature on upper echelons theory that emphasizes the impact of top executives' personal characteristics on their choices by examining the relationship between CEOs holding MBAs and the riskiness of corporate policies, inclu...
Cryptocurrency volatility: A review, synthesis, and research agenda
This paper takes part in the ongoing debate on the newly emerging field of financial technology by systematically reviewing 164 articles on cryptocurrency volatility during the period from 2016 to December 2022. This paper also aims to enlighten aca...
CEO media coverage and cash holdings
Utilising a unique hand-collected dataset, this paper examines the relationship between media coverage of chief executive officers (CEOs) and cash holding. Using a sample of all stocks listed on the S&P 500 over the period 2005–2020, we find a posit...